tags 430380 moreinfo tags 430380 unreproducible thanks On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, John Goerzen wrote: > I am rather hesitant to upgrade my installation due to #430380. But you > should be able to test this with really any JPEG and see if it looks better.
John, Have you confirmed that #430380 is present with the 0.9.2 final that is now available via unstable? I can't reproduce and my album size is 11G and digikam takes about 6 seconds to startup. How would you characterise your albums? How many G, how many files, all JPEG, mixtures of JPEG, TIFF?? Thanks, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
