Package: wesnoth Version: 1.2.5-1 Severity: wishlist Debian experimental contains wesnoth 1.3.2, which is a development release, but rather old. Is it expected that experimental will track development branch, or should I just build it from source?
Regards,
Jan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages wesnoth depends on:
ii libc6 2.6-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfreetype6 2.3.5-1+b1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libfribidi0 0.10.7-4 Free Implementation of the Unicode
ii libgcc1 1:4.2-20070712-1 GCC support library
ii libsdl-image1.2 1.2.5-3 image loading library for Simple D
ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.6-2 mixer library for Simple DirectMed
ii libsdl-net1.2 1.2.5-7+b1 network library for Simple DirectM
ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.11-9 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii libstdc++6 4.2-20070712-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7 X11 client-side library
ii python2.4 2.4.4-4 An interactive high-level object-o
ii wesnoth-data 1.2.5-1 data files for Wesnoth
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-5 compression library - runtime
wesnoth recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
