Bastian Blank wrote: > An arch-any dependency is no reason to make a package also arch-any.
There's a clear reason below. Whether you agree with the reason is a separate issue. > Packages are only moved into testing if they are up-to-date. That's true. However, the change I made fixed a bug for a sid user where the all package was uninstallable because the dependant any package was not built by the autobuilder because of some lengthy delay. With the change I made, now sid will always have the correct packages at all times. Having that consistent working in sid is worth something. Is it worth the same increase in size of the archive (these packages are quite small)? For sid users (of which there are many), I'd say the answer is yes. -- Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
