On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:22:07AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > I'm adding gdb output - though I'm not sure how usable > > > this could be.
> > Not on its own, but thanks for the effort -- to get a good backtrace you > > really need to rebuild su with debugging symbols enabled. :) > As a side effect of that discussion, do you think that adding > libpam-smbpass to samba-dbg would be a good idea? Not really, I think it'd be wasted space. Consider the number of bugs with backtraces we've had over the years for smbd, vs. pam_smbpass. And as seen, in this case the segfault didn't happen in pam_smbpass itself anyway. :) > Also, maybe building -dbg versions of the login and passwd packages > would be a good idea, then. I happen to know the shadow package > maintainer..:-) Heh, or we could adopt the Ubuntu mechanism of centrally storing debugging symbols on a separate server for all packages. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
