On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:53:10 +0200, Arnt wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:13:06 -0600, LaMont wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:07:46AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > > > > nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd nfsd rw 0 0 > > > Actually, that's the line that's causing it... I need to not match > > > on 'nfsd' type mounts... > > > > Which I already don't do... Using the attached mount.preinst, could > > you run "sh -x mount.preinst upgrade" and send me the output? The > > bug doesn't reproduce here for me. > > > ..try with cfs: ;o) > a45:/var/lib/dpkg/info# sh -x mount.preinst upgrade > + case "$1" in > + version= > + export LANG=C > + LANG=C > ++ sed -n '/^[^ ]* [^ ]* nfs /p' /proc/mounts > + NFS_IN_USE='localhost:/var/lib/cfs/.cfsfs /var/cfs nfs > rw,vers=2,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=11,retrans=2,sec=sys,addr=localhost > 0 0' > + '[' -n 'localhost:/var/lib/cfs/.cfsfs /var/cfs nfs > rw,vers=2,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,hard,intr,proto=udp,timeo=11,retrans=2,sec=sys,addr=localhost > 0 0' ']' > + '[' '!' -x /sbin/mount.nfs ']' > a45:/var/lib/dpkg/info# > > ..patience does it, just wait until after nfs-common is upgraded, > maybe do some ugly version dependency? ..fwiw, a simple umount of cfs etc nfs type mounts fixes my problem, and maybe #435414 too? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
