Hi, It looks like I forgot to answer that mail:
Mike Hommey, le Sun 08 Apr 2007 12:56:09 +0200, a écrit : > Now that etch is released, I took a look again at your patch, and don't > really understand why your fix is different for different parts of the > code, why is not defining MAXPATHLEN and PATH_MAX to 1024 everywhere > enough ? In which case, defining them in the appropriate header would > make it work with only one patch... Well, why not, but it's a bit sad that there is such hard limit on the lenght of filenames while the code could be made lengh-unbound. In any case, having xulrunner built with a big "MAXPATHLEN == PATHMAX == 1024" is better that no xulrunner at all (it is blocking a big bunch of gnome & such packages). Samuel
