Hi,

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:03:46AM -0700, James Blanford wrote:
> Package: setmixer
> Version: 27DEC94ds1-1
> Severity: Wishlist
> 
> I have yet to find any sound mixer application that can properly control
> all my sound devices.  With setmixer conflicting with alsa-base and
> aumix, I loose functionality.  Removing the functionality that saves and
> restores mixer settings on boot-up and the resulting conflicts would be
> a better solution than conflicting with similar programs and thereby
> leaving Debian users with one less option.  Just because a program _can_
> be run at system startup doesn't mean it _has_ to be.
> 
> I can have multiple types of web browsers and editors and all manner of
> programs, why can't I have multiple types of mixers?
> 
> The result of the recent changes is that one more useful piece of
> software - one more option - cannot be installed.  On the other hand, if
> the initscripts and conflicts were removed, functionality would be
> retained and I would still have all my options.  If someone wants to run
> setmixer at boot, it's relatively easy to put a little script in
> /etc/rc.boot. It's also reasonable to assume that someone wanting to use
> an obscure commandline program like setmixer would be capable of doing
> so.  An example startup script could even be placed in
> /usr/share/doc/setmixer/examples.
> 
> Referencing bug # 202151, if the maintainer believes, "...looks like
> aumix has improved since I uploaded setmixer, so  there is not much
> specific need for setmixer anymore", he should probably give up the
> program.

Any news on this issue? It seems to also be a duplicate of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368678
and both bug reports are valid, IMO.

I also recently installed setmixer (on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, but I don't
think that matters) and was surprised to see aumix being removed,
which works just fine on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (as does setmixer).

There's no reason at all to conflict here, having multiple mixer
applications installed at the same time is perfectly valid.


Thanks, Uwe.
-- 
http://www.hermann-uwe.de  | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to