On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > I second Peter's statement. > > The result of this bug not being solved is that people are including a > separate GPLv3 copy in their packages (as I'm doing for now). Hopefully, they > will later change it to the normal policy procedure (link to > common-licenses)... > > Some further relevant points: > > * Steve Langasek at debian-legal [and no objections]: > > Barring any adverse license interactions with related packages, GPLv3 > > is fine for main. > > * ftpmaster accepted GPLv3 software into the archive some time ago, so it is > generally considered to be DFSG-free. > > Looks like this bug just needs to be resolved on the technical side now.
Ok, the fact that ftpmaster have already accepted GPLv3 seems a good reason to include it in base-files, but: what about LGPLv3? Should I just forward this bug to the ftpmasters? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
