On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:15:03PM +0000, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > The reason we have that sorting is to get consistency. > > I won't add such an option to disturb it. Not to sort is completely, > > utterly wrong since the order in which addresses are returned from the > > service are more or less random. > > The random order is exactly the point in the first! Nameservers even > return a different one as first specially to get such behaviour.
Please argue that with Uli directly. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgprLnf812C5p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
