On Wednesday 29 August 2007, John Goerzen wrote: > On Wednesday 29 August 2007 5:46:46 am Michail Bachmann wrote: > > Package: bacula > > Severity: important > > > > The installation fails with the following error message: > > Fatal error: PKI encryption/signing enabled but not compiled into > > Bacula. > > > > It seems the "--with-openssl" flag is missing from debian/rules. > > Since encryption/signing was supported in the old version of this > > package it should be supported in the new version. > > See the changelog entry and the referenced discussion: > > * Disable OpenSSL support due to licensing concerns > See thread at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00144.html
I have read the whole thread and it seems to me the licensing concerns will be resolved soon. IMO in the mean time it would be easier to keep the openssl dependency so this package can be tested (by us at least). > I will add this to NEWS.Debian to make it more prominent. Yes, please. Or temporarily revert the change ;-) The change is pretty invasive, since dropping the encryption support means even if we disable the encryption before upgrading all backup clients it will be impossible for us to restore any files which were be stored before the change. CU Micha
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
