Hi,
> > > according to /usr/share/doc/ladspa-sdk/example_plugins.html, plugins
> > > with the same functionality are also included in the cmt plugin
> > > set. thus i would propose to split this package in to two
> > > packages. one for providing the sdk and one for providing the demo
> > > plugins. thus it can be avoided that people have two functionally
> > > equivalent plugins installed on their machines, if they install both
> > > ladspa-sdk and cmt
> >
> > They are so small the difference is negligible.
>
> negligible in technical or in usability terms? in technical terms i
> agree, but for usability it is less confusing, if a user can only select
> one white noise generator instead of having to select one of two
> generators, that are functionally equivalent but having different names
> and ladspa ids
Because they have different names and IDs, it's not a wise idea to
remove them from Debian.
Splitting a package means removing the package from majority of Debian
users. Does this usability glitch warrant that drastic change,
increasing the number of Debian packages by 12 or so ?
I doubt it.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
