Hi Sean, On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 19:34 -0400, sean finney wrote: > i don't think i'd be making a gross assumption to assume that this can > be distributed under the same terms as nagios (since the nagios is GPL'd > and the GPL says it has to be), but it would be nice to have it from > the author himself. but anyway, i won't let that get in the way of > including it in the package in the meantime.
I've mailed the author about this, and this is his anwser (email address protected): Is this sufficient for this patch's inclusion ? Regards, Filip From: Fredrik Wänglund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Filip Sneppe Date: Apr 18, 2005 9:25 AM Subject: Re: Is your grouplist patch licenced under the GPL ? It's freeware. No license, no warranty. Use it As-Is. /FredrikW - Hide quoted text - Filip Sneppe wrote: > Hi, > > I have asked the Debian maintainers of the Nagios package to > include your grouplist patch, as I, and potentially a lot of other > Nagios users, find it very useful. > > See the Debian wishlist/bugreport at: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291775 > > The maintainer asked me if your patch is licenced under > the GPL ? I see from the sourceforge page that APAN is > GPL licenced, but it doesn't explicitly state that the grouplist > patch is GPL licenced. > > Could you clear that out for me ? > > Thanks in advance, > Filip
