On 18/01/2007 at 09:06 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > This is about the postgrey hang that I talked about previously. Really > Annoying. (And I'm still happily running postgrey without any > problems on my own machine, of course...)
Hi, I do not know if this is a regression or what. But since Tuesday I’m experiencing this postgrey crashes (the same error than José Carlos). This is the first time it happened on my server: | Sep 11 02:55:31 bacterio postfix/smtpd[32191]: connect from nixe.bergantells.net[213.239.199.107] | Sep 11 02:55:31 bacterio postgrey[19113]: action=pass, reason=client whitelist, client_name=nixe.bergantells.net, client_address=213.239.199.107, [...] | Sep 11 02:55:31 bacterio postgrey[19113]: cleaning up old logs... | Sep 11 02:55:31 bacterio postgrey[19113]: cleaning up old entries... | Sep 11 02:55:31 bacterio postgrey[19113]: cleaning main database finished. before: 597, after: 500 | Sep 11 02:55:31 bacterio postgrey[19113]: FATAL: Can't call method "txn_commit" on an undefined value at /usr/sbin/postgrey line 289. | Sep 11 02:55:32 bacterio postfix/smtpd[32191]: warning: connect to 127.0.0.1:60000: Connection refused And tonight again: | Sep 12 02:39:42 bacterio postfix/smtpd[21792]: connect from 89.1.126.105.dynamic.barak-online.net[89.1.126.105] | Sep 12 02:39:43 bacterio postgrey[7560]: action=greylist, reason=new, client_name=89.1.126.105.dynamic.barak-online.net, client_address=89.1.126.105, [...] | Sep 12 02:39:43 bacterio postgrey[7560]: cleaning up old logs... | Sep 12 02:39:43 bacterio postgrey[7560]: cleaning up old entries... | Sep 12 02:39:43 bacterio postgrey[7560]: cleaning main database finished. before: 138, after: 138 | Sep 12 02:39:43 bacterio postgrey[7560]: FATAL: Can't call method "txn_commit" on an undefined value at /usr/sbin/postgrey line 289. | Sep 12 02:39:44 bacterio postfix/smtpd[21792]: warning: connect to 127.0.0.1:60000: Connection refused After it happened the first time yesterday, I wiped the postgrey database (so hi doubt it would be db corruption). > Jose, can you please confirm the versions of the postgrey, > libberkeleydb-perl, libdb4.3, libdb4.4 (depending on the libberkeleydb-perl > verison either of those is used) and perl Debian packages that are > installed on your system? These are the versions of the packages you asked Jose: | # dpkg-query -W postgrey libberkeleydb-perl libdb4.3 libdb4.4 perl | libberkeleydb-perl 0.31-1 | libdb4.3 4.3.29-9 | libdb4.4 4.4.20-9 | perl 5.8.8-7 | postgrey 1.31-1 | # uname -a | Linux bacterio 2.6.22.6 #1 Fri Aug 31 13:16:16 CEST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux > Anything special about your system? Xen, vmware or whatever? NFS or > some other network based filesystem on the partition where the database > is located? Kernel is a vanilla (from kernel.org) compiled by myself, I do not use Xen and the db resides on a normal ide disk on the local machine. I kwnow it’s not too much information I’m providing, as this is highly annoying I would be very glad to test anything or provide any additional information you should need. Thanks in advance. -- Kiko
