also sprach Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.09.13.2158 +0200]: > I noticed this old bug. I don't quite understand what you're getting at > though. According to policy, the postinst is always passed a $1, so how > would this be a problem for set -u, unless the postinst were not called > correctly?
I think it was because of $2, not $1. I just went through and corrected all instances of $x. If policy says $1 is always provided, it'll be fine to leave all those occurrences as they are and only tackle the $2. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "if english was good enough for jesus christ, it's good enough for us." -- miriam ferguson, governor of texas
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
