tags 288710 confirmed fixed-upstream thanks At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:48:16 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Maybe should this bug be untagged "upstream" then ? > > Since its working on other versions of glibc (ie SLES9), odds are > its an upstream bug anyway (maybe not, but probably). At this > stage, I think we should leave it for the glibc guys to determine.
Yes, this bug was already fixed in the recent glibc - it's affected only for sarge and sid. Note that the current glibc 2.3.5-1 in experimental does not have this problem. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]