Denis Barbier wrote: >My reading of > http://bugzilla.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=544 >is that upstream moved ISO10646 fonts at the bottom of the file >because few fonts covered most glyphs. >In your comment, you tell that unifont can be used for these languages. >This package is part of Chinese tasks (from tasksel), but not Japanese >ones. The latter contain several other font packages. > > The "unifont" package will be installed by default in Sarge.
And, most Japaness ttf font packages, like ttf-kochi-gothic and ttf-kochi-mincho, support ISO10646 as well, although they seems a little buggy. (Please visit http://lists.debian.org/debian-i18n/2005/04/msg00122.html for more details.) >Thus I am quite inclined to change zh_TW.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE as requested, > Thanks!! >On the other hand, Japanese users will most likely have other fonts >installed, so isn't it better to leave ISO10646 at the bottom of >ja_JP.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE?I think that we should try to use ISO10646 fonts if our >locale were >UTF-8. > I mean, if xx_XX.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE were all correct, We should be able to launch "LC_ALL=xx_XX.UTF-8 xmms" in all xx_XX.UTF-8 locale without any problem. So, I suggest that ISO10646 should be at the top of all xx_XX.UTF-8/XLC_LOCALE. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]