* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-30 09:03:00 CEST]: > Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27/09/2007): > > As this is not a bug in slony itself and a build was uploaded to work > > around this problem (it's now in sync on all archs) and the actual > > bug lies in a different package - can we close this bugreport so that > > the package can transition to testing? > > I can't see any “work around” in either slony1's changelog, and the > blocking bug isn't fixed, so I can't tell.
There is no need for a workaround in slony because this is no slony bug. Please read it up again, thanks. > But if a later version of slony1 includes a workaround A workaround for a breakage that isn't in slony's scope? If we are going to incorporate workarounds for breakages in parts that aren't really related the whole archive will be filled with such workarounds - they are of no help in the long term, just unneeded bloat. So long, Rhonda
