Le samedi 06 octobre 2007 à 08:44 -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:31:17AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:44:34AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Of course this patch is wrong as well, because it adds > > > XS-Python-Version: current, which is incorrect for an architecture: all > > > package. > > > > Where is this documented? And what's the proper value for an > > application package, shipping no modules? > > I found > http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/manoj-policy/x316.html > > which states that the correct value is 'all'. Could you please confirm > that?
Yes, the correct value is "all" (which equals to no field at all) for an architecture: all package. For an application package that doesn't ship any module, there is no need for X?-Python-foobar headers, you just need proper python dependencies. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
