On Tuesday 16 October 2007, A. Costa wrote: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:07:49 +0300 > > George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe that (No packages) is fine when no selectable packages are > > found, OTOH ara exists with a non-zero code when is really confised > > and can't proceed, for instance ara -no_such_option ; echo $? > > Well "(No packages)." output helps a little, as I really hadn't > noticed it. > > Still, the question is how *nix search utils should act. Classic > example, 'grep': --cut--
Sure! You are correct that exit codes should obey the established conventions and ara should follow that as well. Thanks for convincing me on that track! > (I guess this should be a separate 'wishlist' bug.) Yes please, we should work on that issue at some point. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]