On Tuesday 16 October 2007, A. Costa wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:07:49 +0300
>
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe that (No packages) is fine when no selectable packages are
> > found, OTOH ara exists with a non-zero code when is really confised
> > and can't proceed, for instance ara -no_such_option ; echo $?
>
> Well "(No packages)." output helps a little, as I really hadn't
> noticed it.
>
> Still, the question is how *nix search utils should act.  Classic
> example, 'grep':
--cut--

Sure! You are correct that exit codes should obey the established conventions 
and ara should follow that as well. Thanks for convincing me on that track!

> (I guess this should be a separate 'wishlist' bug.)

Yes please, we should work on that issue at some point.

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to