On 17/10/07 at 08:38 -0200, Filipe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> well, acctually it depends on libgems-ruby1.8 . Do you consider this to
> be the same as depend on rubygems?

Well, kind of.

> Also, I don't know if it will be easy
> to remove this dependency because mongrel plugin system
> (libgemplugin-ruby) uses some functions of libgems-ruby1.8. I'n not sure
> at the moment, but AFAIK only libgemplugin-ruby call methods from
> libgems-ruby1.8, so maybe this dependency could be dropped from mongrel,
> but it is needed in libgemplugin-ruby. Otherwise, a plugin library for
> rubygems without rubygems support would be funny :D

Mmh, we clearly need to work on our common position again, and define
what is appropriate with gems, and what isn't... This will even be more
important if/when ruby1.9 will include rubygems in stdlib.
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to