On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Michael Biebl wrote: > according to lintian, the binary package should follow the soname and be > libgnomeui-2-0. Another possible name would be libgnomeui2-0, which > would be more in line with the current practice of naming gnome libs. > > But libgnomeui-0 is definitely weird. Would you consider a rename or > provide reasons why the current naming was chosen?
I agree it's anormal, I don't think we will rename the package now. On the next SONAME change -- if that ever happens -- yes. -- Loïc Minier