Le Wednesday 24 October 2007 22:13:03 Encolpe Degoute, vous avez écrit : > For last version it was not. The i386 packages were made lately (See > #440186). > Then you should wait that these packages have been generated before to > close one bug. > Or you can just said that the bug is fixed upstream without show us your > amd64 logs that we don't care.
Just read again the whole bug report. Do you realise that it was about "incompatible xorg 7.3 (modules 1.4.0)" ? So first of all you have to report one issue per report if you want them to be fixed. Secondly I don't think there's anything I "should" do based on the way you write your requests. This bug is closed since the module now installs with latest xorg package. Furthermore, if you feel frustrated with current fglrx state, you should imagine that me too. Especially since it took me some hours to prepare this crapy package, so I'd appreciate some considerations for that, not agressive requests. I'm not from ATI neither do I support fglrx in any way, please keep that in mind. Romain -- There is a land far, far away Where there's no night, there's only day Look into the book of life and you will see That there's a land far, far away
