On 11/5/07, Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > severity 449418 normal > thanks
Doesn't broken biarch support of lib32asound2 render it somewhat useless, since the sole purpose of lib32* packages is biarch support? If so, wouldn't the bug be 'important'? > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 the mental interface of > Stijn van Drongelen told: > > [...] > > In debian/rules of alsa-lib, there is a variable called bilibdir, > > which contains the path to the ALSA plugins, but it isn't passed > > to ./configure using the --with-plugindir flag. There might be > > more places where the incorrect default value for the library path > > is assumed. > > The default is /usr/lib/alsa-lib. You want the biarch build with > --with-plugindir=$bilibdir/alsa-lib ? It seems so. I'm not sure how the x86_64 version of ld.so is working, but it *seems* the 64-bit version is unable to load the 64-bit ALSA plugins using the 32-bit ALSA library. That's why I figured that 32-bit plugins *could* be loaded by the 32-bit library. > > Another problem with biarch support is that alsa-plugins doesn't > > support biarch-ity at all (see #436201). > > I know. I don't have a 64bit machine handy. But you? Why yes. Yes I have. Hence the "Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)" ;) > Patches are welcome ;) On their way as soon as I figure out how to rewrite debian/rules of alsa-plugins as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
