Looks sane to me, generally. But... > +ifneq ($(DEB_BUILDDIR),$(DEB_SRCDIR)) > +$(error DEB_BUILDDIR and DEB_SRCDIR must be the same for Perl builds) > +endif
If I understand Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric correctly, the above restriction is no= t necessary when using Build directly. I haven't tested, so this is just speculation for now... Another thing is worrying about existing packages - do we not risk breaking some current use of CDBS by changing this now? If so, it might be better to check for Build.PL but instead of setting DEB_PERL_BUILDSYSTEM only warn about it. - Jonas --=20 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er n=C3=A6r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
