I demand that Petr Salinger may or may not have written... [snip] > The implication is in the opposite way, i.e it could be possible > to have in include/config.h: > > #if defined (__FreeBSD__) && !defined (__FreeBSD_kernel__) > #define __FreeBSD_kernel__ __FreeBSD__ > #endif > > and the changes would be "defined (__FreeBSD__)" into > "defined (__FreeBSD_kernel__)". The same relationship is also > between __FreeBSD_version and __FreeBSD_kernel_version.
Discussion on IRC: 17:02:22 <Flameeyes> seems mostly fine to me, although i'd prefer the idea of defining __FreeBSD_kernel__ if __FreeBSD__ is defined 17:06:21 <_ds_> ... so should I push it (committed locally) or do we try to get that change made... 17:06:49 <Flameeyes> _ds_, I'd say get it changed BTW, try not to include generated files in the patch or to terminate every line in it with CRLF... :-) -- | Darren Salt | linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon | RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army | + Use more efficient products. Use less. BE MORE ENERGY EFFICIENT. I can relate to that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
