On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:17:07PM +0000, Andrew Benham wrote:
> I'm slightly loathe to delete line 35 of setenv.c as it's come from
> GNU and it would be easier to track any changes/updates to GNU's
> setenv if we kept their source pristine. YMMV.

I'm going to solve both problems by using the current setenv.c from GNU
libc.  Let me know if it breaks.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to