URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=12874>

                 Summary: Logical '-not' in searches not supported
                 Project: mldonkey, a multi-networks file-sharing client
            Submitted by: gildor
            Submitted on: Thu 04/28/05 at 22:32
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: Program malfunction
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
                 Release: 2-5-28
                 Release: 
        Platform Version: Linux
         Binaries Origin: Debian package
                CPU type: Intel x86

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

The documentation from the '??' command mentions some special args for
the search command, including '-and' '-or' and '-not'.  None of these
work; they give me "Exception Failure("No specialized search '-not'")"
instead.

I did search the binary and found that there was an undocumented
'-without' argument, so I tried that, but I got this strange search
generated:

s alpha -without delta
vs
Searching 1 queries
[7   ]((CONTAINS[delta]) AND NOT (CONTAINS[delta]) AND (CONTAINS[alpha]))

So I think the undocumented -without argument doesn't work either.

This bugs comes from the Debian BTS : 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293016

Regard
Sylvain Le Gall



    _______________________________________________________

Carbon-Copy List:

CC Address                          | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              | Debian BTS entry




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=12874>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to