Dear M Sladen:

Is it possible to respond with a more specific description of the jfs2/apt
conflict? Any response is beneficial.

Due to the distributed nature of Bug Responses, someone may already be
developing a patch. Thank you for your contribution.

Luke

On 11/28/07, Paul Sladen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hit this "apt relying on shared writeable" issue today with a jffs2 issue.
>
> N800/Maemo seem to have got around this by (I think using an older version
> of apt?); it's all a bit messy and could really do with handling
> transparently within apt.
>
> First messages I found on this were from 2001, over at handhelds.org.
> Another option may just be to skipping the cacheing completely---it's
> probably a bit unnecessary on flash devices with (relatively low) seek
> times.
>
>        -Paul
> --
> Why do one side of a triangle when you can do all three.  Helsinki, FI.
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to