On 28/11/07 at 23:51 -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:44:23 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > > on i386. > > > I'm building in an i386 chroot on amd64. Maybe that's part of the > > problem. > > It compiles fine on my machine, which is a normal ix86 machine. And it > apparently compiles fine under amd64, too. (Although ffcall does seem > to have some problems with amd64 -- #451356.) > > Is building in an i386 chroot on and amd64 a "normal" configuration that > we are supposed to be supporting?
I'm not sure. However, the test probably tries to *run* the code, not just compile it. So it probably won't be possible to use the package in an i386 chroot on amd64. > i.e. if it only fails in that configuration, should this bug be > "serious" or "important"? I don't know. However, a better question is probably "do we want it fix or not?". Only 2 or 3 packages currently fail to build in an i386 chroot on amd64, so it would be great not to add another one. :) Note that 1.13.0-7 built fine, too. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
