On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, akira yamada / ?????? wrote:
Basically, we should not use RUBY_VERSION_CODE. So I think that an approach likes the following patch is better. ...
Cool, nothing like do things the Right Way. There is just one problem: renmazuo:/libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src# pwd /libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src renmazuo:/libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src# grep -n RUBY_VERSION * | grep 190 common.c:1416:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190 common.c:3116:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190 common.c:3798:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190 common.c:3815:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190 recnum.c:584:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190 The nmu that was made sometime ago used this variable, so this patch now needs to change the constraints introduced by this nmu too. I'll see if I can do something about this. Cheers, filipe { @ icewall.org GPG 1024D/A6BA423E Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED] } -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]