Hello, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > I have been analyzing packages for the piuparts test, and have > observed that libqt4-ruby1.8 fails the piuparts because it doesn't purge > some files. > > The gzipped log of the piuparts run for libqt4-ruby1.8 is > attached. The problem is that the process > > Install Etch libqt4-ruby1.8 -> upgrade to sid -> purge > > seems to let the following files remain unremoved: > > /usr/bin/rbqtapi owned by: libqt4-ruby1.8 > /usr/share/man/man1/rbqtapi.1.gz owned by: libqt4-ruby1.8
I'm somehow puzzled, because I've just tried to do this on a sid chroot (installing the etch version then the sid version, then purging), and I find nothing in /var/lib/dpkg/diversions, nor any trace of a /usr/bin/rbqtapi left. What I find puzzling as well is the following lines from the log file you attached: 7m15.1s DUMP: (Reading database ... 8289 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libqt4-ruby1.8 ... Removing `diversion of /usr/bin/rbqtapi to /usr/bin/rbqtapi.qt3 by libqt4-ruby1.8' Removing `diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/rbqtapi.1.gz to /usr/share/man/man1/rbqtapi.qt3.1.gz by libqt4-ruby1.8' 9m18.2s DUMP: (Reading database ... 5080 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libqt4-ruby1.8 ... Purging configuration files for libqt4-ruby1.8 ... No diversion `diversion of /usr/bin/rbqtapi to /usr/bin/rbqtapi.qt3 by libqt4-ruby1.8', none removed No diversion `diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/rbqtapi.1.gz to /usr/share/man/man1/rbqtapi.qt3.1.gz by libqt4-ruby1.8', none removed Together, they seem to indicate that the diversions were removed. Could it be a false positive ? If not, do you have any idea of what is causing the problem ? Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ -- pretty boring signature, isn't it ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]