Hi Petter! You wrote:
> > I'm not sure I really like that solution though, as debugfs is a > > generic kernel feature and not specific to blktrace afaik. As the > > kernel developers put it: "In principle, it is the same as /proc, > > just with the explicit information that binary compatibility will > > never be a goal" [1]. So I would find it most natural to do the > > mounting alongside with mounting /sys and /proc. > > I got no hard feeling either way, apart from keeping the complexity of > the initscripts scripts down. But I notice from [1] that it state > that the debugfs is intended for kernel developers. This is quite > different from sys and proc, which is intended for everyday use. Did > I misunderstand something? No that's mostly right I guess. It's still a generic interface though. > Also, can you verify that it is possible to enable the debugfs by > adding a line in /etc/fstab or not? Putting it in fstab works fine in principle. Still, I would find that a less optimal solution than just mounting it by default. Would it really complicate the initscript so much to just mount an extra fs? Best regards, Bas. -- +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]