Package: libpam-shield Version: 0.9.2-2 Severity: minor Tags: patch The description field reads
It locks out default by null-route or iptable rule attackers trying to login by brue-force methods. As a native English speaker, I find this structure a bit difficult to follow -- it sounds like the package locks out "iptable rule attackers" using null-route. Why would anyone attack an iptable rule? Instead I propose It locks out brute-force password crackers using null-route or iptables rules. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]