Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Setting
> > Architecture: some long list without ia64
> > strangely seems to work now. I am quite sure it failed earlier for me
> > today. ;-)
>
> This is exactly what I am trying to avoid. It makes it harder for
> unofficial archs to be able to be there. And neither me nor cdbs should try
> to do any blockers for unofficial archs.
>
> If this is the solution to the bug I filed, then it is no solution at all.
I have no idea what you are saying here, why would the implementation of cdbs
affect the existence of unofficial architectures?
Your original bug report said,
I tried different things, like -Npackage in DH_OPTIONS, but failed.
That should work now.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
