This one time, at band camp, Philippe Cloutier said: > Hum, I don't really understand what you wrote. My main interest is to have > this specific bug marked as an RC bug if it is an RC bug. For example, if the > package is unusable, the severity should be upgraded to grave, so that klamav > is not released in lenny as an unusable package. I'm asking because klamav > seems broken to me, but I never used it, so it would be easier for someone > who already used it to determine if klamav is just partially broken but also > partially usable, and set the bug's severity accordingly.
Right. Sorry - my reading of your mail suggested that you were inquiring with the hope that someone else would escalate the bug to RC for you, even though you thought the package is broken. What I have been trying to say is, "if your impression is that the package is broken (nonfunctional), I will lend my support because my impression is that the package is broken (misdesigned)". Hopefully that makes my opinion clearer. Please feel free to adjust severities as you like - my impression is that no one is maintaining this package any more. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
