Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:03:55PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Package: addresses-for-gnustep
Version: 0.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
When building 'addresses-for-gnustep' on i386/testing,
I get the following error:
gcc VCFViewer.m -c \
-MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1
-DGNU_RUNTIME=1 -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DGSWARN
-DGSDIAGNOSE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fgnu-runtime -Wall
-fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString
-I/addresses-for-gnustep-0.4.6/Frameworks -I. -I/root/GNUstep/Library/Headers
-I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers
-I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Network/Library/Headers
-I/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers \
-o shared_obj/VCFViewer.o
In file included from VCFViewer.m:16:
VCFViewer.h:17:47: warning: GWorkspace/ContentViewersProtocol.h: No such file
or directory
In file included from VCFViewer.m:16:
VCFViewer.h:25: error: cannot find protocol declaration for
`ContentViewersProtocol'
make[3]: *** [shared_obj/VCFViewer.o] Error 1
With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled
on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep
in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably
not enter sarge because of #304968.
#304968 will be closed when gnustep-back will be a valid candidate (in 2 days).
gnustep-back is a valid candidate tomorrow; you ought to close this bug now.
What bug should I close now :
#304968 (gnustep-base)
or #307290 (addresses-for-gnustep)
or both ?
Eric
