Hi,
On Tue, 03.05.2005 at 17:02:22 +0200, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 03 May 2005, Toni Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 03.05.2005 at 12:16:51 +0200, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0 > > oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2 > > oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x4d0 > > > > > anyway please try kernel-image-2.6.11 from unstable! > > > > This is currently impossible, due to #306930. Currently, I try to fix > > this (ie, create a local kernel-nonfree-... package). > > in oom cases 2.6.11 is very recommended as it has nice fixes from -aa > in that release. thanks for this statement. I almost assumed as much after some research on Google... some remarks, though: I have an identical machine running 2.6.10 with no problems. Why does one machine exhibit this problem, and the other doesn't? > here you'lll find the intersting non-free bits: > http://www.acm.cs.rpi.edu/~dilinger/kernel-source-nonfree-2.6.11/ Thanks, this may speed things up considerably. > do you have enough swap, is it activated? $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1033256 505200 528056 0 118348 168228 -/+ buffers/cache: 218624 814632 Swap: 2104220 0 2104220 Should be sufficient... ;-) Best, --Toni++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]