On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:32 +0000, Regis Boudin wrote: > wmweather+ is one of the 6 packages that build-depend on it, one of the > two actually using it, the other being amaya which I maintain. > > My current plan is to adopt w3c-libwww until it can be removed, so both > packages will have to find a way to transition away from it. I also plan > to port amaya to use libcurl, and I would strongly recommend you do the > same for wmweather+ if you want to keep it in the archive.
It looks reasonable to get rid of libwww. I'll coordinate with upstream of wmweather+ regarding this issue. It could happen that I have to do the port myself (upstream didn't do anything for years now, but there were also no serious things to be done). I'd appreciate if you could tell me your experiences from your porting efforts. > If you have any comment about the libwww status or alternative suggestions > to the situation, please don't hesitate to give them so we can go forward. What is your plan time-wise for the whole removal-thing to happen? Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
