I'm probably wrong about the pilot udev rule - see this link for how it is explained to me. Something about "using libusb" vs using the kernel "visor" module. I was probably confusing the two methods and trying to do some of each.
http://lists.pilot-link.org/pipermail/pilot-link-devel/2008-January/001671.html I will send the udevinfo -a when I get home again, and try out some stuff as well. bjb On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 01:18:57AM -0500, Brenda J. Butler wrote: > > There are two places where rules related to palm's exist: > - udev.rules, where the symlink is created > - z60_libpisock9.rules, where permissions and ownership is decided > for the actual device nodes. > > udev.rules is owned by package udev. > z60_libpisock9.rules is owned by package pilot-link. > > Maybe that rule about pilots in udev.rules should be moved to > z60_libpisock9.rules? > > Just a thought ... > > bjb > > ---end quoted text--- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
