On Jan 8, 2008 11:38 AM, Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:33:00AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > <snip> > > > However, soon PyEPL will depend on pyglet and I don't think that a > > > package dependency on sympy is the proper way to deal with it. > > > > > > I'd be glad if we could discuss possible ways to go on from here. > > > > No, the proper way, of course, is to package pyglet separately. We > > include it in sympy > > just because we include it in the upstream tarball (so that it's > > selfcontained), but > > in Debian we should create a separate package for pyglet. I just didn't have > > time to do it. > > > > So if you package pyglet, that'd be awesome. > Right, so I'll continue with out packaging and file an ITP next ;-)
Yep. :) > > (There are actually some subtle issues, like that we need to have the latest > > svn version of pyglet in sympy, due to some bugs in pyglet, that were fixed > > recently, but this will settle in time.) > Good to know. Thanks for the information. > > Could you drop me a note when pyglet upstream does a release that works > with Debian sympy? But probably this will just be the next one... uscan > will notify ;-) Yes. Simply package the latest released version. We'll switch to it with sympy when Alex releases a new version of pyglet and it gets to Debian. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]