I don't think you should drop ipw3945 support completely, as it still compiles
for 2.6.24 kernel with the patch that can be found here:
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071223.025752.89232a4d.it.html
The default should become iwl3945, but please leave at least for a while
ipw3945. iwl3945 it's not too stable, has missing features (led support for
example).
The two drivers can live together. So why an user can't choose to use ipw3945
instead of iwl3945?
Emilio
I'll report the patch here:
--- ipw3945.h.orig 2007-07-31 09:53:39.000000000 +0300
+++ ipw3945.h 2007-12-23 04:09:59.000000000 +0200
@@ -2414,6 +2414,18 @@ enum {
#define IPW_ORD_TABLE_7_MASK 0x0000F700
/*
+ * For backword Kernel compatibility (after 2.6.24)
+ */
+#if !defined(MAC_ARG)
+#define MAC_ARG(x) ((u8*)(x))[0],((u8*)(x))[1],((u8*)(x))[2],((u8*)(x))[3],
((u8*)(x))[4],((u8*)(x))[5]
+#endif
+
+#if !defined(SET_MODULE_OWNER)
+#define SET_MODULE_OWNER(dev) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
+
+/*
* Table 0 Entries (all entries are 32 bits)
*/
enum {
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
