Rogier Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You'll need to come up with much better arguments (that probably >> do not exist) to make me change dd to be non-compliant in this respect. > > In my interpretation of the quoted part of the standard, dd has become > non-compliant, by not reporting the statistics when its output happens > to be connected to a pipe.
If you're interested in getting a feel for how the standards-writers themselves interpret this, you're welcome to write to the mailing list dedicated to this sort of thing: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
