Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/06/08 04:54, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>> "Antique-looking Japanese TrueType Mincho, based on Meiji-era font"
>>
>> Is it OK?
>
> IMO, both this and Justin's suggestions are good.
I thought this one didn't work - is it saying it's a Mincho, which
is based on a font? Make it simpler... either:
Japanese TrueType Mincho font based on Meiji-era designs
or move the historical details to the long description and say:
antique-looking Japanese TrueType Mincho font
(there's no need for initial capitalisation in short descriptions).
Alternatively you could say:
Meiji-era Japanese TrueType Mincho font
Meiji-style Japanese TrueType Mincho font
(The first implies that it really is from the 19th century - that
it's the original font, converted into .ttf format. The second
implies it's a modern font based on the look of 19th-century ones.)
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
