On Feb 8, 2008 9:10 AM, Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:39:27AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > > Maybe we should clone 406357? You can fix your FTBFS by removing > > pychecker from debian/rules, and I'll keep this bug against pychecker > > open until we can figure out the problem. That way, the severity for > > the pychecker bug can be set to normal (which is more appropriate > > since AFAIK you're the only affected user), and users won't have any > > problem building your package in the meantime. > Here's a patch that fixes the problem for me. Using if instead of elif > we might end up trying to index an already removed list element:
I agree, it looks like that was supposed to be an elif, not an if. Your change looks correct, and I don't think it can hurt anything. I'll get the patch applied and a new package uploaded as soon as possible. I'll close both this bug and 460698 as part of my upload. Also, I submitted your patch upstream as SF request #1889814. Thanks for looking into this. I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to it sooner, and I appreciate the help. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cedar-solutions.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]