I am puzzled by this. It worked fine and I did not do anything
special. Certainly no recompilation. Here's the details on what I
installed:
ii netatalk 2.0.3-8~test1 AppleTalk user binaries
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 718452 2007-12-26 10:42 /var/cache/apt/archives/
netatalk_2.0.3-8~test1_i386.deb
# md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/netatalk_2.0.3-8~test1_i386.deb
6792e123dcb1ffd26a47547469f4a1db /var/cache/apt/archives/
netatalk_2.0.3-8~test1_i386.deb
I certainly am using encryption:
AFPD_UAMLIST="-U uams_dhx.so"
However, my uams_dhx.so file is back from May:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11492 2007-05-05 20:26 /usr/lib/netatalk/
uams_dhx.so
9d657391828872c73b75485345fe1cfa /usr/lib/netatalk/uams_dhx.so
My guess is that your build of Netatalk is using this older module,
which I did compile myself.
Regards,
Tim
On 29-Dec-07, at 5:24 , Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Oh, and another peculiarity: I discovered yesterday that despite my
promises, the unofficial test binaries I provided was _not_ compiled
against openssl. Some claim that MacOS 10.5.1 does not work at all
without it - but you succeeded anyway. Did you recompile, or are you
willing to reveal your working authentication setup?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
