On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 09:50:52PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > The severity was not serious because iproute is not needed to run > guessnet, but one of the optional scripts. It could use a 'recommend', > though. The version of guessnet I'll upload in the next days has the > script changed (thanks to Thomas Hood) to just not use iproute.
That approach works for me.
> But I see you're quite strongly motivated to see guessnet depend on
> iproute, which suggests me you are using the test-wireless-ap script:
> does it work well? I don't use guessnet for wireless and I can't test
> it (or support it decently), but I'm definitely looking for feedback on
> it.
I was using the following in my /etc/network/interfaces:
test wireless essid blah blah blah
However, I am interested in test-wireless-ap, but am a little confused
regarding how it would work for me.
I have one card and several networks which require a key and do not
broadcast their SSID.
The man page indicates that all tests are run concurrently and the first
one to succeed wins. So if all four of my tests are trying to run
iwconfig wlan0 with different settings, not sure how it can determine
who wins. How would I place this script in /etc/network/interfaces in
my case?
--
Encrypted Mail Preferred:
Key ID: 8527B9AF
Key Fingerprint: E1B6 40B6 B73F 695E 0D3B 644E 6427 DD74 8527 B9AF
Information: http://www.gnupg.org/
ASCII ribbon campaign:
() against HTML email
/\ against Microsoft attachments
Information: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
