Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:12:25AM -0600, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: > > Ryan Murray wrote: > > > > I've removed mips/mipsel from vcs-tree control file. > > > > > > This is incorrect -- there's no reason that, given the existance of the > > > build depends on mips/mipsel, that this package couldn't build. The > > > package > > > should stay listed as arch: any. This way, once sbcl is available for > > > mipsen, > > > vcs-tree will build without any extra work. > > > > vcs-tree never had arch: any. But, I see your point that it can be > > arch: any since the build/run dependency on sbcl will limit which > > architectures vcs-tree will be available. > > > > Would you still remove the mips/mipsel .deb files for vcs-tree so that > > new versions of vcs-tree can migrate to testing? > > Testing is frozen at the moment, so unless the version in unstable > is elegible for testing under the freeze exception rules, I see no need > to hurry -- but also no need to wait, so I'll process this when I next > to arch-specific removal requests. Meanwhile I think you can safely > upload an arch:any version.
Thanks for the info. The version of vcs-tree in sarge is fine. I'll go ahead and upload an arch:any version of vcs-tree. Thanks again for the help, -- Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
