Hello Peter, hello Jamie, [ cf. http://bugs.debian.org/465771 ]
I, for one, actually like the leading zero. For me it makes the display feel complete when using 24 hour mode. Jamie, what do you think? Cheers, Flo
--- Begin Message ---Package: xdaliclock Version: 2.25-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch 'xdaliclock -countdown' automatically enables 24-hour mode, so that the number of hours is always displayed correctly. However, 24-hour mode also implies a leading 0 in the hours column, which I do not want. Thus I'd like for 'xdaliclock -12 -countdown' to have its usual effect of saying "4:33" instead of "04:33". The following patch fixes this. The command line I use for testing: xdaliclock -12 -title 'Can we go home yet?' -countdown "$(LC_TIME=C date +'%b %d 17:00:00 %Y')" -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ --- xdaliclock-2.25/X11/digital.c +++ xdaliclock-2.25/X11/digital.c @@ -735,10 +735,12 @@ tm->tm_sec = delta % 60; tm->tm_min = (delta / 60) % 60; tm->tm_hour = (delta / (60 * 60)) % 100; - twelve_hour_time = 0; } - if (twelve_hour_time && tm->tm_hour > 12) tm->tm_hour -= 12; - if (twelve_hour_time && tm->tm_hour == 0) tm->tm_hour = 12; + else + { + if (twelve_hour_time && tm->tm_hour > 12) tm->tm_hour -= 12; + if (twelve_hour_time && tm->tm_hour == 0) tm->tm_hour = 12; + } time_digits [0] = (tm->tm_hour - (tm->tm_hour % 10)) / 10; time_digits [1] = tm->tm_hour % 10; time_digits [2] = (tm->tm_min - (tm->tm_min % 10)) / 10;
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
