Hi,
Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto wrote:
> I just make a backport version of OpenOffice.org (1:2.4.0~rc1-2) for
> Debian etch, the build is good but when I installing the 'ure-dbg'
That contradicts what you said in 466931. Can you please decide?
In any case, why is this important and why did you file this in the
bugtracker? etch-backport is not in the scope of this BTS and I'll do
a backport when 2.4 is final.
> package it dos resolve the dependenci whit the 'ure' packages because
> differ version.
works for me on sid.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org$ dpkg --info
ure-dbg_1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre_amd64.deb | grep Version
neues Debian-Paket, Version 2.0.
Version: 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org$ dpkg --info
ure-dbg_1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre_amd64.deb | grep Depends
Depends: ure (= 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Debian/Pakete/OpenOffice.org$ dpkg --info
ure_1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre_amd64.deb | grep Version
neues Debian-Paket, Version 2.0.
Version: 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2.3pre
> Package: ure-dbg
> Version: 1.4+OOo2.4.0~rc1-2mjflve1
> Section: devel
> Priority: extra
> Architecture: i386
> Depends: ure (= 1:2.4.0~rc1-2mjflve1)
^
The epoch shouldn't be there. Maybe a behaviour difference between etchs and
sids dpkg? As said above, works for me on sid.
I'll eventually just disable the URE packaging for the etch backport.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
