Michael Biebl wrote:
The 94cpufreq hook in version 0.99.2 is wrong. It does always set the
performance governor on suspend. A quick look into the last release of
pm-utils (0.99.4) seems to have fixed this error.
Why is that wrong? Using the performance governor is the most sensible
choice over any over governor.
Two reasons:
1) The user's configuration and preferences should not be ignored.
pm-utils should respect the configured governor or else any
configuration option for the governor (like you can configure it
directly as an option in the kernel or with help of a package like
cpufrequtils) is useless.
2) When it comes to energy/battery saving the performance governor is
the last sensible option.
Please consider packaging this new version?
We will skip 0.99.4 and directly go with the next major upstream release.
Ok.
Regards and keep up your good work
Kai Weber
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
